Category: Natural Resources
Canadian companies interested in cross-border natural resource projects should be aware of a regulatory development in the United States that significantly revises the jurisdictional scope of the Clean Water Act. On December 11, 2018, two federal agencies, the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, proposed a new rule dramatically altering federal regulatory authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA) by redefining what constitutes a “water of the United States.” If enacted, the new rule proposes to limit and simplify the CWA’s jurisdictional analysis and provide regulatory certainty for resource development projects. Canadian companies with, or interested in, a cross-border project should follow, and consider participating, in the rule’s 60-day...
On October 31, 2018, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced that it adopted rules to modernize mining property disclosure in order to harmonize SEC disclosure requirements with international standards. The SEC had proposed rules in June 2016 which received numerous comments and as a result a number of changes were made to the original proposed rules. A high level summary of the final rules and changes compared to the proposed rules can be found here: www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-248 The final rules provide for a two-year transition period so that a registrant will not be required to begin to comply with the new rules until its first fiscal year beginning on or...
One of the principal sources of uncertainty, expense, and delay in the permitting process for many mining and infrastructure projects in the United States, especially those generating public controversy, is compliance with the environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). On June 20, 2018, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) seeking public comment on potential revisions to its implementing regulations for the procedural provisions of NEPA. NEPA documentation is generally required for any project, public or private, that requires approvals from the federal government. The ANPR is a continuation of the Trump administration’s efforts to address inefficiencies in the federal permitting process...
Since January 1, 2016, the SEC has publicly released its correspondence relating to 60 comment letters sent to Canadian issuers with respect to annual reports filed on Form 40-F pursuant to the Canada-U.S. Multi-Jurisdictional Disclosure System (MJDS). We have analyzed the content and key takeaways from these letters, including: The SEC’s most common areas of focus; Recent trends; and Common errors to be avoided. Background The MJDS system allows Canadian issuers that satisfy certain market capitalization and other requirements to file an annual report with the SEC on Form 40-F. Except for a few items, a Form 40-F does not impose U.S. disclosure requirements upon a Canadian issuer and, instead, includes and relies...
The recent settlement agreement between Kinross Gold Company and the Securities and Exchange Commission is a reminder to Canadian cross-listed companies that it is not enough to adopt a parent-company level anti-corruption policy designed to promote compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Effective implementation and monitoring at the operating level is also needed. In Kinross’ case, the SEC charged, in effect, that Kinross had acquired two African mining operations from a third party, was aware of deficiencies in the mines’ controls at the time of acquisition, failed to timely put in place appropriate controls, and then failed to maintain them once implemented. Specifically, SEC alleged that Kinross awarded a logistics contract...
The SEC is aiming to finalize its new mining disclosure rules within the next year, according to statements made last week by William Hinman, Director of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, at the Securities Regulation Institute. For more details regarding the SEC’s original 2016 proposal to revamp the rules, and reactions by industry, see our summary of the initial proposal (here: www.dorsey.com/newsresources/publications/client-alerts/2016/07/new-mining-disclosure-rules) and our last blog post (here: crossbordercounselor.com/status-check-on-the-secs-proposed-overhaul-of-the-mining-disclosure-regime/).
About 18 months have passed since the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published its bold attempt to modernize the disclosure requirements for mining companies that are listed on U.S. stock exchanges or otherwise report to the SEC. With final rules not yet adopted, the fight for a streamlined reporting regime continues. The SEC’s proposed overhaul was spawned by industry request – specifically, a request by the Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration (SME), the leading professional society of mining professionals in the United States, that the SEC bring its disclosure requirements into the modern age and adopt a new disclosure regime based on the Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO)...
Financial assurance and reclamation bond requirements can be a significant cost and regulatory burden for Canadian issuers with mining projects in the United States. Over the last several years, companies with U.S. mining projects have waited while the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has considered expanding the financial responsibility requirements applicable to the hardrock mining industry. On December 1, 2017, EPA released a pre-publication version of a final rule determining that imposing CERCLA 108(b) financial responsibility requirements on the hardrock mining industry was unwarranted.[1] The Final Rule satisfies a court-ordered timeline and rejects a proposed rule, published in January 2017,[2] which proposed regulations imposing CERCLA 108(b) financial responsibility requirements on operators of hardrock...
One of the most difficult and costly aspects of developing mining projects in the United States is the permitting requirements under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The Trump administration is currently undertaking a rulemaking process to examine and redefine the scope of the CWA. Companies with mining projects in the United States should consider participating in the rulemaking process to assure that their interests are represented. In 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) (collectively the Agencies) adopted final regulations redefining the term “waters of the United States,” which defines the scope of federal regulatory jurisdiction under the CWA. States, industry groups, and environmental organizations...
Citing concerns over economic harm, President Trump has targeted his predecessor’s climate change agenda. He has sought reversal of a number of key Obama regulations, directives, and other actions, including the Clean Power Plan and the U.S. participation in the Paris accords. The overall blueprint for these actions is found in his March 2017 Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth. This order lays out for the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Interior, as well as other agencies, specific actions to take to promote the development and use of domestically produced oil, gas, coal, and nuclear power. The agencies are only now beginning to undertake these actions, which could have...
