Author: Christopher L. Doerksen
Chris helps clients raise money by selling equity and debt, buy and sell assets and businesses, manage their SEC disclosures, implement corporate governance structures, list on stock exchanges, and establish equity-based compensation arrangements. He currently serves as the head of Seattle’s Corporate department and co-chair of the Canada Cross-Border Practice Group.
View Full Bio on Dorsey
Way back in 2017, one of our earliest posts discussed the legal and financial risks to both the issuer and the finder if an issuer pays a finder’s fee in connection with a sale of securities in the United States, and the person receiving the fee is not a U.S. registered broker-dealer. In many cases, this type of fee violates U.S. securities laws. However, this continues to occur from time to time, especially in deals where U.S. counsel is not consulted prior to the closing. For a brief summary of the risks of paying this type of finder’s fee, and an example of one issuer that declared bankruptcy as a result, read on....
On January 24, 2024, the SEC issued new guidance on when a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) may run afoul of the U.S. Investment Company Act (the Act). While this guidance was directed at SPACs that register or file reports with the SEC, it is also instructive for other types of shell companies, including Canadian capital pool companies, SPACs, and similar shell companies that do not file reports with the SEC. Why Care About the U.S. Investment Company Act? If a Canadian issuer is deemed to be an investment company that has failed to register under the Act, it is prohibited from engaging in any business in the U.S. or offering or selling...
As discussed in our eUpdate published today, the SEC on January 24, 2024 adopted final rules amending the disclosure and registration requirements applicable to special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and shell companies that register or file reports with the SEC. These amendments impose significant new requirements on SPAC IPOs, as well as de-SPAC and similar transactions for SEC reporting shell companies. The new SEC rules do not apply to Canadian capital pool companies, SPACs, or shell companies unless they register or file reports with the SEC. As part of the final rule package, the SEC also amended its guidance for all SEC reporting companies on how to make economic projections in SEC filings,...
On October 10, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved amendments to the Regulation 13D-G reporting regime for persons who beneficially own more than 5% of a class of securities (“5% Owners”) that is registered under Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The amendments accelerate the deadlines by which 5% Owners must file initial reports and amendments on Schedule 13D or 13G, mandate the use of machine-readable language in those reports, and provide for additional amendments and guidance. The amendments apply to 5% Owners of all Section 12 registered securities, including 5% Owners of Canadian foreign private issuers and MJDS filers listed on Nasdaq, the New York...
As discussed in our Governance & Compliance Insider blog and a recent Dorsey eUpdate, all companies with securities listed on NYSE, NYSE American, or Nasdaq will be required to adopt and comply with updated clawback policies governing the recovery of erroneously awarded compensation by December 1, 2023, pursuant to rules proposed by each stock exchange and approved by the SEC under Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. The new clawback requirements will apply to substantially all listed companies, including foreign private issuers and Canadian MJDS filers.
On December 14, 2022, the SEC adopted final rules amending Rule 10b5-1, a safe harbor from liability under the U.S. insider trading rules. The safe harbor permits directors, executive officers and others, including issuers, to engage in securities transactions while in possession of material non-public information, by entering into a binding contract, instruction or plan adopted prior to effecting the transaction and at a time when the seller or buyer was not in possession of material non-public information about the issuer. The new rules include a number of measures intended to limit certain potentially abusive strategies permitted under the old rules and certain new disclosure requirements intended to enhance investors’ understanding of the...
Did you know that the Canada-U.S. multijurisdictional disclosure system (MJDS) includes an SEC form that does not include any minimum market capitalization requirement, and can be used to complete a public offering of securities in the United States without triggering any ongoing SEC reporting requirements? It’s true. Form F-7 allows certain TSX and TSXV-listed Canadian companies to extend a rights offering to its United States shareholders on a public offering basis, provided they satisfy certain form eligibility requirements. U.S. information legends are included in the Canadian offering documents, which are filed with the SEC under cover of Form F-7, together with certain consents. A Form F-7 is not normally reviewed by the SEC. ...
As many of our readers will have heard, the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) has announced the adoption of a new prospectus exemption for certain reporting issuers listed on a Canadian stock exchange (the “Listed Issuer Financing Exemption”), effective November 21, 2022. To date, little attention has been given to the potential effect of the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption on the practices of Canadian listed companies raising funds from U.S. investors. In this post, we discuss those implications and suggest methods for relying on the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption while still preserving the ability to raise funds from U.S. investors. Overview of the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption The Listed Issuer Financing Exemption will allow...
In 2022, many SEC reporting companies with mineral resource assets completed their inaugural SEC annual report on Form 10-K or 20-F subject to the SEC’s mining disclosure rules in subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K (“subpart 1300”), and filed their inaugural subpart 1300 technical report summaries, if applicable. As 2023’s annual reporting season approaches, we outline for our readers some important factors to consider in preparing for Year 2 of subpart 1300 compliance. Depending on the situation, an issuer may need to begin its preparations well in advance of its fiscal year end (“FYE”), or risk being in default of its reporting requirements. Overview Subpart 1300 requires an issuer with material mining assets that...
In Canada it’s considered no big deal to ask shareholders to approve a continuance or redomicile of a company from one province to another, or between Canadian provincial and federal jurisdictions. That’s also largely true from a U.S. securities perspective, but only because the continuance is being made within the same country. If a continuance or redomicile is made from one country to a different country, it’s a completely different story. Canadian counsel and their clients are sometimes surprised to hear that if a company continues from Canada to another country, or if a company continues into Canada, the failure to comply with U.S. securities laws may subject the company to rescission rights...
